Search the cases we're tracking — try a natural query like “murder cases in Maharashtra”.
34 cases · page 2 of 2
The Delhi High Court has directed central government authorities to allow office-bearers of the evicted Central Secretariat Club to access their former premises at the President's Estate to retrieve club records and belongings. The court granted the representatives a two-week window to complete the collection of items.
In the case of ANI Media v Open AI OPCO, the Delhi High Court ruled on 24 July 2026 that OpenAI's use of copyrighted news content to train large language models is prima facie fair dealing under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act. Following this, the court dismissed the plaintiff's plea for an interim injunction on 17 August 2026 and refused to grant an immediate stay on the ruling on 15 September 2026.
An 86-year-old father alleged that his youngest son forced him out of the ancestral home at Baramunda village. The Orissa High Court ordered the son to vacate the ground floor and restore it to the father, while leaving a separate dispute over land parcels bought in the son's name to civil court.
The Calcutta High Court held that oral testimony and documents alone were insufficient to establish ground-level realities in an encroachment dispute. The court ordered a survey to bridge the gap between paper documents and ground reality, directing completion of trial within 6 months.
The Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against seven persons from Anekal taluk, finding that the case constituted an abuse of process of law and that the dispute was essentially civil in nature.
Sir Sobha Singh and Sons Pvt Ltd is engaged in a long-standing property dispute with the Union of India over the Ambassador Hotel premises, involving government-initiated eviction proceedings and a demand for 940 crore rupees. As reported on 19 August 2026, the Delhi High Court stayed the operation of a 9 June 2026 judgment that had reversed a 2009 trial court ruling in favour of the company, directing all parties to maintain the status quo.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that police cannot interfere in purely civil property disputes and should only intervene to maintain public order. The court warned that deviations from this principle may invite departmental and contempt proceedings.
A writ petition challenging a government order constituting a Special Investigation Team to probe alleged land encroachment by a trust linked to the Art of Living Foundation in Bengaluru South Taluk. The Karnataka High Court granted an interim stay of the SIT probe.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the religious character of the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque complex as a Saraswati temple. The decision has been challenged by the Muslim side in the Supreme Court, while Hindu parties have filed caveats to ensure they are heard during the proceedings.
This case involves a dispute regarding a woman's right to reside in a shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. While the Supreme Court previously ruled in October 2020 that a woman cannot be evicted from a house not owned by her husband, the Delhi High Court held on 19 June 2026 that a daughter-in-law cannot occupy a relative's property once the license granted to her husband has expired.
YSRCP MP Maddela Guru Murthy filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging the state government's decision to allot land to technology firms, including Google, at a nominal rate of 99 paise per acre. As reported on 12 March 2026, the High Court declined to grant interim orders regarding the allotment.
The Supreme Court set aside a 14-year-old Rajasthan High Court order on 19 January 2026, effectively reopening a land dispute between the Jaipur Development Authority and the family of Rajasthan Deputy Chief Minister Diya Kumari regarding a property worth Rs 400 crore. This development follows the Supreme Court's closure of separate, unrelated appeals concerning hotel property disputes among members of the Jaipur royal family as reported on 20 December 2021.
Sister Lucy Kalappura challenged her expulsion by the Franciscan Clarist Congregation and sought protection against eviction from the Karakkamala Convent. Following her challenge in the Mananthavady Munsiff Magistrate court, the Kerala High Court granted her relief on 13 August 2021, permitting her to continue residing at the convent.
Major international academic publishers sued a photocopy shop at Delhi University, alleging copyright infringement regarding the creation of student course packs. In a ruling finalized by a Division Bench on 7 December 2016, the Delhi High Court held that reproducing copyrighted material for educational purposes does not constitute infringement. This decision, which upheld an earlier order from a Single Judge, concluded the litigation.
Looking for a specific case? Describe the event and we'll verify it against trusted sources.
