State of Odisha — 86-year-old father vs youngest son, ancestral home dispute

Updates

1. News9 Sep 2026

   86-year-old father alleged youngest son forced him out of ancestral home; Orissa High Court orders son to vacate, leaves separate dispute over land parcels bought in son’s name to civil court

   The son should vacate the ground floor of the house at Baramunda village to enable his father to live there safely and hand it over to him by August 22, 2025, positively, besides reporting compliance.

   Explanation in simple terms

   An 86-year-old father in Odisha accused his youngest son of forcing him out of their family home. A high court agreed with the father and ordered the son to leave the house. However, the court decided that a separate disagreement about land that was bought in the son's name should be handled by a different, lower court instead.

   timesofindia.indiatimes.com
2. Judgment24 Mar 2026

   Orissa High Court rules in favor of 86-year-old father in ancestral home dispute

   The Orissa High Court has upheld the rights of an 86-year-old widowed father to reside in his ancestral home, ordering his youngest son to vacate the premises. The court emphasized that senior citizens are entitled to live with security and dignity, while directing that separate disputes regarding land parcels purchased in the son's name be resolved through civil court proceedings.

   Explanation in simple terms

   The Orissa High Court has ruled that an 86-year-old father has the right to remain in his ancestral home despite a dispute with his youngest son. The court decided that the father should not be forced out of his own property by his child. This judgment ensures the elderly man can continue living in his home peacefully. The decision prioritizes the father's right to shelter and security in his final years.

   indianexpress.com