Search cases

Arihant Tiwari vs. Union of India and Others — Ken-Betwa Link Project Environmental PIL

Petitioner Arihant Tiwari filed a public interest litigation before the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging the Ken-Betwa Link Project due to environmental and wildlife concerns for the Panna Tiger Reserve. On 11 October 2026, the court refused to grant interim relief. Following a 18 October 2026 hearing, the court directed the Centre to submit a report from the Central Empowered Committee regarding the alleged irregularities.

Petition regarding government honors for deities at Kullu Dussehra

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the criteria for government honors at the International Kullu Dussehra festival. In a judgment issued on 16 October 2026, the court affirmed government discretion by ruling that deities classified as household or newly carved do not possess an inherent right to receive official invitations or VIP facilities.

In re: Union Carbide toxic waste disposal at Pithampur

The Madhya Pradesh High Court is hearing a matter concerning the management and disposal of approximately 900 tonnes of toxic waste ash originating from the Union Carbide site in Bhopal, currently stored at a facility in Pithampur. The Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board has filed a fresh status report regarding the presence of mercury in the waste.

State vs Ramashankar Yadav & 7 others — Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case

Eight individuals were arrested for the alleged embezzlement of donations and bribery for temple appointments at the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. The process of framing charges was deferred on 11 October 2026 because six accused had not received their chargesheet copies, and the Allahabad High Court dismissed the bail application of one accused accountant on 17 October 2026.

Suresh Rathore vs. State of Uttarakhand

The Uttaranchal High Court quashed two FIRs against former MLA Suresh Rathore on 12 June 2026, citing concerns regarding attempts to implicate him in the Ankita Bhandari murder case. Although previously arrested on 15 June 2026, Rathore was questioned at his residence by a Central Bureau of Investigation team on 17 October 2026 in connection with the ongoing probe.

Challenge to the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions and of Appointments or Posts in the Services under the State) (Amendment) Act, 2022

On 12 October 2026, the Karnataka High Court struck down the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions and of Appointments or Posts in the Services under the State) (Amendment) Act, 2022, ruling that the 50 percent total reservation ceiling is a binding constitutional principle. Following this, the Karnataka Cabinet formally resolved to challenge the decision by filing a special leave petition in the Supreme Court on 15 October 2026, a move that is opposed by the Dr. Ambedkar Scheduled Castes Federation.

State of Bihar vs. Accused in Patna High Court appeal

In a judgment delivered on 17 October 2026, the Patna High Court modified a 2010 conviction by setting aside a charge of attempted rape. The court ruled that entering a woman’s house at night, extinguishing a lamp, and covering her mouth constitutes outraging the modesty of a woman rather than an attempt to commit rape, while upholding convictions for assault and house trespass. The accused was ordered to pay ₹25,000 as compensation to the victim on 17 October 2026.

State of Bihar vs Naushad Ahmed — Triple Talaq conviction

On 17 October 2026, a Patna court sentenced Naushad Ahmed to two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹6,500 for practicing instant triple talaq, marking the first conviction under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, in Bihar. The court acquitted the defendant of charges related to an attempted acid attack on his wife on the same day. As of 17 October 2026, the defense intends to challenge the conviction in the high court.

PepsiCo India Holdings vs Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)

PepsiCo India Holdings has challenged FSSAI regulatory restrictions in the Delhi High Court that prevent the company from labeling its Sting beverage as an energy drink. Following the court's refusal to grant immediate relief to PepsiCo on 12 October 2026, a division bench directed the single judge on 13 October 2026 to provide a detailed explanation regarding the labeling curbs.

Passengers vs Alliance Air Aviation Ltd — Hyderabad–Mysore flight cancellation compensation case

Following the cancellation of a Hyderabad–Mysore flight, 33 passengers initiated a consumer dispute against Alliance Air Aviation Ltd. The Telangana High Court directed the airline to comply with consumer forum orders to provide compensation, which was subsequently fulfilled by the airline after non-bailable warrants were issued by the consumer court.

In re: Maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens - Eviction of daughter-in-law from shared household

On 17 October 2026, the Delhi High Court modified an eviction order involving a father-in-law and his widowed daughter-in-law. While upholding the father-in-law's possession rights, the court ruled that he cannot evict the daughter-in-law unless he provides alternate accommodation or a monthly rent of Rs 15,000. This follows an earlier 14 October 2026 ruling establishing a legal obligation for fathers-in-law to provide residence to dependent widowed daughters-in-law who lack independent support.

In re: Living conditions at P&T Apartment Complex, Mundamveli

The Kerala High Court is addressing unsafe living conditions at the P&T Apartment Complex in Mundamveli, where residents face structural defects and severe sewage issues. On 17 October 2026, an amicus curiae report recommended the immediate relocation of all residents due to significant safety hazards, including proximity to high-tension power lines. Additionally, the Child Rights Commission registered a case regarding the facility's uninhabitable state on 16 October 2026, with a hearing scheduled for 30 November 2026.

Sonu Sonkar vs Home Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi

Sonu Sonkar, a life convict, filed a contempt petition in the Delhi High Court alleging that the Delhi Government failed to comply with a May 2025 court order directing the reconsideration of the cancellation of his remission. In response, the High Court has ordered the Home Secretary to appear in person due to the non-filing of a compliance affidavit.

Educomp Solutions Limited vs Union of India

The Delhi High Court quashed the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) investigation into the affairs of Educomp Solutions, ruling that the government's decision to initiate the probe was made without proper application of mind and suffered from procedural lapses.

In re: Challenging the use of 'Shoorveer' song in Mirzapur movie

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed before the Delhi High Court seeking the removal of the song 'Shoorveer' from the movie 'Mirzapur', alleging that linking the composition to the film's content was inappropriate. The Court closed the matter after the filmmakers confirmed the removal of the track and were directed to make a donation to the Army Welfare Fund.

State vs. Sachin Waze and others — Antilia bomb scare and Mansukh Hiren death case

This case involves allegations of conspiracy and extortion against former police officer Sachin Waze regarding an explosive-laden vehicle found near the residence of Mukesh Ambani and the death of Mansukh Hiren. While a special NIA court granted bail to Sachin Waze on 28 September 2026, the Bombay High Court is currently reviewing an appeal against this decision. As of 17 October 2026, the High Court is scrutinizing Waze's assets and the potential impact of his release.

Prasanth K. v. District Collector and another

The Kerala High Court clarified the applicability of safety regulations under the Explosives Rules, 2008, holding that specific amendment requirements for permanent fireworks shops do not extend to temporary festival shop licences. The Court directed the District Collector to process the petitioner's application for a temporary fireworks licence in accordance with Rule 84 of the Rules.

K.M. Shajahan vs State of Kerala — Appointment of bodybuilders as Police Inspectors

The petitioner sought a vigilance inquiry into the appointment of bodybuilders Chitharesh Natesan and Shinu Chovva as Armed Police Inspectors. The Kerala High Court disposed of the plea after the government informed the court that it was re-examining the Cabinet decision regarding these appointments.

Enforcement Directorate vs. Sanjeev Arora

Ludhiana West MLA Sanjeev Arora faces an Enforcement Directorate money laundering and GST fraud investigation originating from a FIR filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Following his detention on 9 May 2026, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed his regular bail application on 16 October 2026. On 17 October 2026, the court further ruled that Enforcement Directorate officers have the authority to report cognizable offences discovered during searches conducted under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.

Amitabh Bachchan vs Various Defendants — Personality Rights Infringement Suit

Amitabh Bachchan filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court to protect his personality rights against unauthorized commercial exploitation. On 10 October 2026, the court scheduled a hearing for 16 November 2026 to address a potential settlement reached through mediation and directed the actor to appear in person if the settlement process is not finalized by that date.