Supreme Court Review 2025: Lacking a principled stance on environmental rights - Supreme Court Observer
In May, a two-judge Bench of Justices A.S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan declared post-facto environmental clearances “illegal” in Vanashakti v Union of India. In July, the Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India (CREDAI) filed a review ...
Explanation in simple terms: India's Supreme Court is being criticized for not taking a clear, consistent stance on protecting the environment. In the Vanashakti case, the court allowed companies to get environmental approvals after they'd already started projects—rather than requiring approval first. Critics say this weakens environmental protections and shows the court isn't strongly defending people's right to a clean environment.