State vs Parminder Singh — Karnal Bastara Toll Plaza terror case

Timeline

1. 1 Nov 2026News

   NIA court denies bail to Punjab man in terror conspiracy case

   According to the prosecution, Parminder was among four occupants of a white Toyota Innova intercepted by the police at Bastara toll plaza in Madhuban, Karnal, on May 5, 2022

   Hindustan Times

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   A special court refused to release the accused from jail while he awaits his trial.

   Who:

   The court is the Special NIA Court in Panchkula, the agency is the NIA, and the accused is Parminder Singh.

   When:

   Reported on 1 Nov 2026.

   Where:

   Panchkula, Haryana, and the Bastara toll plaza in Madhuban, Karnal.

   Why:

   The accused is charged with being part of a conspiracy involving terrorism.

   What it means:

   The accused will remain in custody while the legal process continues.

2. 1 Nov 2026News

   Terrorists arrested in Karnal denied bail: They were caught with IEDs and weapons at Bastara Toll, the accused are linked to Pakistan-based terror handler Rinda.

   Karnal Bastara Toll Plaza terror case NIA court denies bail to accused Parminder Singh. Follow Dainik Bhaskar Latest Updates. The special NIA court of Haryana located in Panchkula rejected his regular bail plea on October 31. The court observed that the evidence gathered during the investigation and the statements of witnesses prima facie indicate the accused's role in the alleged terror activities.

   Dainik Bhaskar

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   A court rejected a request for release from jail for a man accused of terror activities.

   Who:

   Parminder Singh is the accused, and the Special NIA Court in Panchkula is the court deciding the case.

   When:

   The court rejected the request on October 31, and the report appeared on November 1, 2026.

   Where:

   The case is at the Special NIA Court in Panchkula, Haryana, following an arrest at the Bastara Toll Plaza.

   Why:

   The court decided there is enough initial evidence and witness testimony to suggest the accused took part in terror activities.

   What it means:

   The accused will remain in custody while the legal process continues.