Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association vs Union of India

12 Nov 2018News

Supreme Court reiterates findings from Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association judgment

A 2018 Supreme Court judgment references the 2016 Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association decision, acknowledging it as the foundational ruling for subsequent petitions filed regarding alleged extra-judicial executions in Manipur.

Supreme Court of India

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court confirmed that a previous major decision remains the basis for later court filings.
Who:: The Supreme Court acts as the final judge, and the Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association acts as the group that brought the case.
When:: Reported on 12 Nov 2018.
Where:: Manipur.
Why:: The court recognizes the older decision as the starting point for newer petitions regarding alleged killings outside the law.
What it means:: This confirms that the earlier ruling serves as the official foundation for all ongoing legal challenges in these cases.

3 Aug 2016News

Unlawful encounters

The Supreme Court's July 8 judgment in the Manipur encounter case holds important lessons for the security forces in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Hindu

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court issued a judgment regarding unlawful killings in Manipur.
Who:: The Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association are the petitioners, the Union of India is the respondent, and the Supreme Court of India is the decision-making body.
When:: Reported on 3 Aug 2016.
Where:: Manipur.
Why:: The court provided guidance regarding the actions of security forces.
What it means:: The ruling provides important lessons for security forces operating in Jammu and Kashmir.

13 Jul 2016Judgment

Supreme Court judgment on Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association vs Union of India

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case, directing an investigation into 1,528 alleged extra-judicial killings in Manipur committed by security forces and police. The court underscored that the state cannot use excessive force under the cover of AFSPA and emphasized the necessity of accountability.

Indian Kanoon

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court ordered an investigation into many alleged extra-judicial killings.
Who:: The Supreme Court of India is the court, while the security forces and police are the groups involved in the allegations. The Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association is the group that brought the case against the Union of India.
When:: Reported on 13 Jul 2016.
Where:: Manipur.
Why:: The court ruled that the state cannot use too much force under the cover of special laws and demanded accountability for these actions.
What it means:: Officials must now investigate these 1,528 alleged killings to determine what happened.

Similar Cases

On trial

Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan vs Union of India — Pellet gun ban petition

A public interest litigation seeks directions to ban the use of metallic pellets fired from pump action rifles or projectile action guns by law enforcement agencies for dispersing civilian assemblies. The petition was filed following injuries sustained by a Delhi protest victim during the Sansad Chalo protest.

Court matter

Judgment delivered

Bipin Agrawal vs State of Maharashtra

The Bombay High Court declared the 2017 arrest of businessman Bipin Agrawal illegal, citing collusion between police officers and a private developer. The court ordered the state government to pay Rs 5 lakh in compensation to Agrawal and directed disciplinary action against the police and the Magistrate involved in the detention.

MaharashtraCourt matter

Judgment delivered

Unidentified businessman vs State of Maharashtra — Writ petition regarding illegal arrest

The Bombay High Court has declared the 2017 arrest of a Mumbai businessman in an extortion case to be illegal. The court ordered the Maharashtra government to pay ₹5 lakh as compensation to the individual and directed that action be initiated against the police officials and the magistrate involved in the process.

MaharashtraCourt matter

Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association vs Union of India

Case summary

Latest development

Timeline

Supreme Court reiterates findings from Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association judgment

Unlawful encounters

Supreme Court judgment on Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association vs Union of India

Similar Cases

Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan vs Union of India — Pellet gun ban petition

Bipin Agrawal vs State of Maharashtra

Unidentified businessman vs State of Maharashtra — Writ petition regarding illegal arrest

Smt. Nandinee Das vs. State of Assam and 38 others

Shopkeepers of Ayodhya vs State of Uttar Pradesh

State vs. Former CI Nagaraju — Custodial death of Sai Krishna at Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada

Discussion