Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan vs Union of India — Pellet gun ban petition

Hearing31 Jul 2026

Supreme Court to examine Centre's SOPs on pellet gun use in crowd control

The Supreme Court agreed to examine the Centre's standard operating procedures on pellet gun deployment and indicated the petition must specifically challenge the legal framework permitting pellet use rather than seeking outright decommissioning.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court will review the government rules for using pellet guns to control crowds.
Who:: The Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan are the petitioners, the Union of India is the government agency, and the Supreme Court of India is the judicial body.
When:: Reported on 31 Jul 2026.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court wants to see the standard procedures for using these weapons.
What it means:: The petitioners must now focus on challenging the legal rules that allow pellet gun use.

Hindustan Times

Hearing30 Jul 2026

Supreme Court acknowledges pellet gun use in exceptional circumstances as part of graded police response

During proceedings, the Supreme Court indicated that use of pellet guns in exceptional circumstances may be permissible as part of a graded police response to crowd control, while directing preservation of RAF ammunition logs.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court decided pellet guns may be used in rare situations for controlling crowds.
Who:: The Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan are the petitioners, and the Union of India is the responding party.
When:: Reported on 30 Jul 2026.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court views pellet guns as part of a graded police response, meaning a stepped approach to controlling crowds.
What it means:: The court ordered officials to keep records of the ammunition used by the Rapid Action Force.

The Hindu

Hearing30 Jul 2026

Supreme Court directs Centre to preserve RAF ammunition log in pellet gun case

The Supreme Court issued directions to the Centre to preserve the ammunition log of RAF during hearing on petitions seeking a ban on metallic pellet guns used during civilian protests. The bench indicated that a complete ban would be considered vague without challenging existing police regulations.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court ordered the government to keep records of ammunition used by the Rapid Action Force.
Who:: The Supreme Court of India is the court, the Centre is the government agency, and the Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan are the petitioners asking for a ban.
When:: Reported on 30 Jul 2026.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court wants these logs kept while it considers requests to ban metallic pellet guns used during protests.
What it means:: The court signaled that a total ban on these weapons is difficult without first changing current police rules.

Verdictum

Hearing30 Jul 2026

Supreme Court directs Delhi Government to ensure treatment for injured persons in pellet gun case

In the ongoing petition against pellet gun use, the Supreme Court has directed the Delhi Government to ensure proper treatment for persons allegedly injured during the July 20 protest incident near Connaught Place.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court ordered medical care for people hurt by pellet guns during a protest.
Who:: The Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan are the petitioners, the Union of India is the government responding, and the Delhi Government is the agency ordered to provide help.
When:: Reported on 30 Jul 2026.
Where:: The Supreme Court of India heard the case regarding events near Connaught Place.
Why:: The court acted to ensure proper medical treatment for people allegedly injured during a protest.
What it means:: The Delhi Government must now make sure the injured people receive the necessary care.

LiveLaw

News29 Jul 2026

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND · ANR. PRASHANT BHUSHAN [P-1] Versus · UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. S. P. SHARMA , R. C. KOHLI , P. N. PURI , GURMEET · SINGH MAKKER , B. KRISHNA PRASAD , RAJ · BAHADUR YADAV [R-1], N. VISAKAMURTHY [R-1], DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 29-07-2026 ·

Explanation in simple terms

What:: A legal case regarding the use of pellet guns has been added to the court schedule.
Who:: The Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan are the petitioners, and the Union of India and others are the respondents.
When:: Reported on 29 Jul 2026.
Where:: The Supreme Court of India.
What it means:: The case is listed for a court hearing on this date.

Supreme Court of India

Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Prashant Bhushan vs Union of India — Pellet gun ban petition

Case details

Updates

Similar Cases

Uttar Pradesh vs. Two Police Officers — Custodial Death Conviction (Etah)

State vs two police constables — Tiruvannamalai rape case

State vs. Police Personnel — Custodial Death Case, Madhya Pradesh

State vs Nine Police Officers — Sathankulam custodial death case

State vs. Former CI Nagaraju — Custodial death of Sai Krishna at Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada

State vs. Police Personnel — Custodial death of B. Ajith Kumar

Discussion

Supreme Court to examine Centre's SOPs on pellet gun use in crowd control

Supreme Court acknowledges pellet gun use in exceptional circumstances as part of graded police response

Supreme Court directs Centre to preserve RAF ammunition log in pellet gun case

Supreme Court directs Delhi Government to ensure treatment for injured persons in pellet gun case

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

Pellet Gun in CJP Protest: Shot in the face, Delhi protest victim moves Supreme Court seek pellet ban

Ex-IB Special Director and two protest victims petition Supreme Court against pellet guns