Search cases

Shopkeepers of Ayodhya vs State of Uttar Pradesh

The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) has issued a notice to the Uttar Pradesh government regarding the eviction of shopkeepers in Ayodhya to facilitate the construction of a super-speciality hospital. The court questioned the authorities on the lack of rehabilitation and compensation provided to those whose leasehold and livelihood rights were allegedly affected by the project.

State vs. Driver — Attempt to murder of traffic policeman in Bengaluru

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an attempt to murder case under Section 307 of the IPC against a Bengaluru driver who allegedly ran over a traffic policeman to avoid a drunk driving check. As reported on 23 October 2026, the court ruled that the victim's survival does not negate the presence of mens rea, allowing the trial to proceed based on eyewitness evidence and the nature of the injuries sustained.

Mohan Meakin Limited vs State of Maharashtra and FSSAI — Old Monk labelling and sale restriction dispute

Mohan Meakin Limited is challenging a sales restraint on Old Monk in the Bombay High Court, citing financial losses exceeding ₹500 crore. As reported on 23 October 2026, the Maharashtra government filed a separate challenge against the FSSAI in the same court, contending that the central authority has improperly encroached on state powers regarding alcohol labeling and regulation.

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

Actor Darshan, Pavithra Gowda, and several co-accused are facing murder and conspiracy charges regarding the death of Renukaswamy in a Bengaluru sessions court. Following the Supreme Court's refusal of bail on 15 May 2026, the trial continues with ongoing proceedings concerning approver status and evidence, while a departmental inquiry into a sub-inspector for potential evidence fabrication was initiated as reported on 10 October 2026. On 23 October 2026, the court denied bail to co-accused Anukumar and Jagadish and rejected Pavithra Gowda's request to be moved to a different prison cell.

State of Tamil Nadu vs Rajasthani man — AI deepfake video case involving CM Joseph Vijay

A man from Rajasthan was arrested by Tamil Nadu Police for allegedly creating and circulating a deepfake AI video of Chief Minister Joseph Vijay to scam the public. The Madras High Court has granted him bail with specific conditions.

Parents of missing student vs High Commission of India

Parents filed a habeas corpus-like petition before the Kerala High Court seeking to locate their daughter, who has been unreachable for two years while pursuing an MBA in the UK. Following an inquiry directed by the court, the bench observed on 23 October 2026 that an adult woman has the right to live according to her own choice and cannot be forced by parents or police to return home against her wishes.

State of Karnataka vs Four youths — Obscene video circulation case

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition filed by four youths seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against them for allegedly circulating an obscene video targeting a female assistant lecturer. As reported on 23 October 2026, the court refused the request, allowing the case to proceed.

Malti Mukesh Dehariya vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Others — Challenge to no-confidence motion

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh has granted interim relief to Malti Mukesh Dehariya, the President of the Seoni District Panchayat, by staying a proposed no-confidence motion against her. The court directed that she remain in her position until the next hearing of the matter.

In re: Availability and cleanliness of women's public toilets in Delhi

The Delhi High Court is hearing a petition regarding the inadequate number and poor maintenance of public toilets for women in the city. The court has observed that access to hygienic public toilets is an essential component of the right to life and has proposed surprise inspections by social work students to monitor the situation.

State of Rajasthan vs Mahesh Joshi and Mukesh Pathak — Jal Jeevan Mission corruption case

Former Rajasthan minister Mahesh Joshi and Mukesh Pathak faced allegations of corruption in the Jal Jeevan Mission project, leading to their arrest by the Anti-Corruption Bureau. Following the Supreme Court's orders on 16 October 2026 and 19 October 2026, the court set aside a Rajasthan High Court order from 13 August 2026 and granted both individuals regular bail. In its formal judgment issued on 22 October 2026, the Supreme Court reiterated that pre-trial detention should not function as punishment.

In re: Challenge to detention order passed by Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has summoned the Deputy Commissioner of Srinagar to appear in person and produce the original records concerning a detention order. The court observed that the order appeared to have been lifted mechanically from a police dossier without an independent application of mind by the detaining authority.

State of Maharashtra vs 20 unidentified accused — Lonavala call centre fraud case

Twenty individuals were arrested on 16 October 2026 for allegedly operating an illegal call centre in Lonavala that defrauded foreign nationals through fake drug-related threats. On 22 October 2026, the Bombay High Court ordered their release after ruling that their detention was illegal due to the absence of cognizance and a valid remand warrant.

State of Karnataka vs. Unnamed Accused (Father of minor driver)

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition to quash culpable homicide charges against Nadeem ur Rehman, a 51-year-old from Mysuru, for allegedly allowing his minor son to drive a vehicle involved in a 2020 fatal crash. As reported on 22 October 2026, the court ruled that the trial must proceed to determine his liability, while clarifying that a minor's knowledge cannot be automatically attributed to a parent solely based on their relationship.

Restaurant Owners vs State of Gujarat — Non-veg food ban near Somnath Temple

Six restaurant owners have filed a petition in the Gujarat High Court challenging a government directive banning the sale and storage of non-vegetarian food within a 500-metre radius of the Somnath Temple. The state government has defended the policy, arguing that the right to carry out business cannot supersede the religious significance and sanctity of pilgrimage sites.

Bhilai Municipal Corporation Engineers vs State of Chhattisgarh — Paver block construction irregularities

Engineers from the Bhilai Municipal Corporation filed a petition before the Chhattisgarh High Court challenging disciplinary actions and recovery orders initiated against them regarding alleged financial irregularities in paver block construction works. The High Court has granted an interim stay on the recovery proceedings and the show-cause notices issued by authorities.

Occupants of Riyaz Manzil vs Union of India

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has stayed eviction proceedings against the occupants of Riyaz Manzil in Bhopal, which is currently subject to a dispute regarding enemy property status. The court has directed the petitioners to approach the Central government and provided a 60-day period for the competent authority to make a decision on the matter.

Election petition challenging the election of Datia MLA Ghanshyam Singh

An election petition in the Gwalior High Court challenges the election of Congress MLA Ghanshyam Singh from the Datia constituency for allegedly failing to disclose criminal cases in his election affidavit. On 20 October 2026, the Madhya Pradesh High Court issued a formal notice to the MLA regarding these allegations.

Public Interest Litigation regarding fraudulent issuance of stamp papers in West Bengal

A PIL has been filed in the Calcutta High Court alleging that the West Bengal state government and police officials fraudulently issued stamp papers. The petition claims these papers were used to coerce Trinamool Congress (TMC) workers into supporting a rival faction.

In re: Construction at Pulinkudy beach (Vizhinjam port)

The Kerala High Court has halted construction work at Pulinkudy beach as part of the Vizhinjam port project. The order was issued following an incorrect affidavit submitted by the Coastal Regulation Zone Authority regarding environmental clearance requirements.

State vs. Father of minor — Mysuru fatal car accident case

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition filed by a Mysuru resident seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him. The case stems from an incident where his 14-year-old son, who was driving a car, caused an accident that resulted in the death of three people. The court rejected the plea to drop the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.