Unnamed Petitioner vs. State — Matrimonial Fraud Case

Updates

1. News28 Aug 2023

   Formulate rules to govern matrimonial websites to prevent brides from falling prey to frauds: Madras High

   The bench was dealing with a plea of a pre-arrest bail of a man, who allegedly defrauded and duped several high-profile women by posting fake details on the...

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The High Court ordered the government to create rules for matrimonial websites to stop online fraud.

   Who:

   The Madras High Court acted as the legal authority, and a man is accused of deceiving several women.

   When:

   Reported on 28 Aug 2023.

   Where:

   Madras High Court, Tamil Nadu.

   Why:

   The court acted because a man is accused of using fake information to scam women on these websites.

   What it means:

   The court wants new regulations for these websites to prevent people from being cheated in the future.

   Lawbeat
2. Hearing23 Aug 2023

   Madras High Court dismisses petition to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial fraud case

   The Madras High Court dismissed a criminal original petition filed by the accused, Prasanna Chakravarthy, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 1102 of 2023 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate XVII, Saidapet.

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Madras High Court rejected a request to cancel an ongoing criminal case involving marriage-related fraud.

   Who:

   The accused is Prasanna Chakravarthy, and the agency is the Madras High Court.

   When:

   Reported on 23 Aug 2023.

   Where:

   The case is at the Metropolitan Magistrate XVII in Saidapet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

   What it means:

   The criminal case will continue against the accused in the lower court as previously scheduled.

   Indian Kanoon