State vs Satendra alias Chunmun and Narayan — Section 307 IPC case

Updates

1. News9 Sep 2026

   Despite the police's closure report, if there is prima facie evidence of crime in the case diary, the magistrate can summon the accused: Allahabad High Court

   An FIR was lodged on 18 March 2015 at Bidhuna police station in Auraiya district against Satendra alias Chunmun and Narayan under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)…

   Explanation in simple terms

   The police submitted a closure report saying there was no crime to prosecute against the accused. However, the Allahabad High Court ruled that if the case documents contain enough evidence suggesting a crime did occur, a judge can still order the accused to appear in court. This means the case can move forward even when police recommend closing it.

   hindi.livelaw.in
2. HearingDate unknown

   Allahabad High Court reviews challenge in Jeetu Soni vs State of U.P. case involving Satendra @ Chunmun and Narain

   The Allahabad High Court examined a challenge regarding a case under Section 307 IPC involving accused Satendra @ Chunmun and Narain, who are alleged to have fired at and injured Anil Soni.

   Explanation in simple terms

   The Allahabad High Court is currently reviewing a legal challenge related to a case involving two individuals named Satendra and Narayan. They were previously accused of attempted murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. This update indicates that the court is examining the details of their case following a petition filed by Jeetu Soni. The court will now decide whether to uphold or change the previous legal proceedings concerning these individuals.

   indiankanoon.org