State of Rajasthan vs Jhabra Ram — Rajasthan espionage case

Timeline

1. 29 Oct 2026News

   Supreme Court cancels bail for Pakistani spy Jhabra Ram: Ordered to surrender within two weeks; High Court had granted bail.

   Supreme Court cancels Pakistani spy Jhabra Ram bail order in Rajasthan espionage case. Follow Dainik Bhaskar Latest Updates. The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail of Pakistani spy Jhabra Ram. Jhabra Ram is accused of spying for the intelligence agency ISI and passing confidential information related to the Army to his handlers across the border.

   Dainik Bhaskar

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Supreme Court cancelled the bail that allowed the accused to remain free while awaiting trial.

   Who:

   The Supreme Court is the high court that cancelled the order, while the High Court had originally granted bail to the accused, Jhabra Ram, who is accused of spying for the ISI.

   When:

   Reported on 29 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Rajasthan.

   Why:

   The accused is accused of spying for the ISI and passing confidential Army information to handlers across the border.

   What it means:

   The accused must surrender to authorities within two weeks.

2. 29 Oct 2026News

   Non-Furnishing Of Written Grounds Of Arrest Is No Automatic Ticket To Bail Without Prejudice: Supreme Court

   The Supreme Court has held that failure to furnish grounds of arrest in writing cannot, by itself, entitle an accused to regular bail where there has been substantial compliance and no prejudice is shown. It cancelled the bail of a man accused of passing sensitive military information to handlers of a Pakistani intelligence agency. ]

   Law Trend

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Supreme Court cancelled bail for a person who was previously released from custody.

   Who:

   The Supreme Court is the highest court, the accused is the person facing charges, and the Pakistani intelligence agency is a foreign group.

   When:

   Reported on 29 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Rajasthan.

   Why:

   The court decided that not receiving written reasons for an arrest does not automatically grant freedom.

   What it means:

   Being released from custody before a trial is now harder to obtain if the police followed rules.