State of Karnataka vs Unnamed Accused — Dharmasthala burials investigation

Hearing12 Jun 2026

Former sanitation worker questioned by SIT in Dharmasthala case

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has accused a former sanitation worker of spreading false information regarding the alleged secret burials. The individual has publicly questioned the delay in the SIT's investigation.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: A former sanitation worker was questioned by an investigation team regarding comments made about a case.
Who:: The Special Investigation Team (SIT) acts as the investigators, and the former sanitation worker is the person being questioned.
When:: Reported on 12 Jun 2026.
Where:: Dharmasthala, Karnataka.
Why:: The team claims the worker spread false information about secret burials and questioned why the investigation is slow.
What it means:: The investigation team is now looking into the statements made by the worker as part of their broader inquiry.

The Indian Express

Filing13 Jan 2026

Karnataka High Court directs SIT to respond to PIL on 74 unnatural deaths

The High Court has ordered the SIT to provide a response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that seeks the registration of separate FIRs for 74 unnatural deaths reported in Dharmasthala between 1990 and 2021.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The High Court has ordered an investigative agency to reply to a request for separate legal investigations.
Who:: The Karnataka High Court is the court, the Special Investigation Team is the agency, and the Unnamed Accused is the party under investigation.
When:: Reported on 13 Jan 2026.
Where:: Karnataka, Dharmasthala.
Why:: A Public Interest Litigation, which is a court case brought for the public good, requested separate formal police reports for many unnatural deaths.
What it means:: The Special Investigation Team must now provide a formal response to the court regarding these past deaths.

The Hindu

Hearing10 Sep 2025

Karnataka HC stays coercive action against advocate in Dharmasthala case

The Karnataka High Court has granted a stay on any coercive action against advocate Manjunath N, who represents a complainant whose daughter allegedly went missing in 2003, after he was summoned by the police.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Karnataka High Court stopped the police from taking forceful steps against an advocate.
Who:: The Karnataka High Court is the court, the police are the agency, and Manjunath N is an advocate.
When:: Reported on 10 Sep 2025.
Where:: Karnataka.
Why:: The court granted this stay after the police summoned the advocate regarding a case about a missing person.
What it means:: The police cannot use force against the advocate while the court reviews the matter.

Lawbeat

News17 Aug 2025

Dharmasthala secret burials case: Karnataka govt likely to table response in Legislative Assembly tomorrow

Last week, the BJP had demanded that the state government table an interim report on the Dharmasthala investigation carried out by SIT.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The state government is preparing to present its official reply regarding a secret burials investigation.
Who:: The government of Karnataka is the agency responsible for providing the information to the Legislative Assembly.
When:: Reported on 17 Aug 2025.
Where:: Karnataka, within the Legislative Assembly.
Why:: The report relates to an investigation into secret burials found in the Dharmasthala area.
What it means:: The government will formally share its response or update on this investigation before the state lawmakers.

The Indian Express

News22 Jul 2025

Dharmasthala mass burial case: Timeline of key events, how investigation unfolded

A whistleblower alleged mass burials and sexual assaults in the temple town of Dharmasthala in Karnataka between 1998–2014, sparking public...

Explanation in simple terms

What:: Authorities are investigating multiple burials found at a specific site.
Who:: The State of Karnataka is the legal party representing the government against the unnamed accused.
When:: Reported on 22 Jul 2025.
Where:: Dharmasthala, Karnataka.
Why:: The investigation follows the discovery of mass burials that raised legal concerns.
What it means:: The timeline establishes how the case unfolded for future legal proceedings.

India Today

State of Karnataka vs Unnamed Accused — Dharmasthala burials investigation

Updates

Similar Cases

State vs. Unknown Accused — Death of a 14-year-old tribal girl in Dumka

State vs 16-year-old girl and others — Mandya grandmother murder case

Investigation into the 2012 Sowjanya rape-murder case

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

State of Karnataka vs. Shubha Shankar and Others — Ring Road murder case

State of Karnataka vs. Prajwal Revanna — rape and sexual assault case

Discussion

Former sanitation worker questioned by SIT in Dharmasthala case

Karnataka High Court directs SIT to respond to PIL on 74 unnatural deaths

Karnataka HC stays coercive action against advocate in Dharmasthala case

Dharmasthala secret burials case: Karnataka govt likely to table response in Legislative Assembly tomorrow

Dharmasthala mass burial case: Timeline of key events, how investigation unfolded

Dharmasthala burials case: Former SC Judge warns police against pressuring whistleblower

Dharmasthala secret burials: Justice Gopala Gowda seeks protection for whistleblower and lawyers, probe monitored by retired HC judge