State of Haryana vs Maruti Suzuki workers — Manesar factory violence case · CaseTrack India

Judgment delivered

State of Haryana vs Maruti Suzuki workers — Manesar factory violence case

This case relates to the July 2012 violence at the Maruti Suzuki plant in Manesar, which resulted in the death of a senior HR executive and injuries to numerous employees. The trial involves multiple workers charged in connection with the incident.

Type: Court matter
State: Haryana
Watching: 0

RiotingMurderLabour dispute

Case details

AI-extracted — may be inaccurate

Verdict: Convicted
Prevailing party: Prosecution / State

Judgement

The court found 31 workers guilty in connection with the 2012 violence at the Manesar plant that led to the death of a senior HR manager.

Updates

Judgment10 Mar 2017
2012 Maruti Factory Violence Case: 31 workers convicted by Gurgaon court
A Gurgaon court convicted 31 Maruti Suzuki workers for the 2012 Manesar factory violence, in which a manager was killed and several employees were injured.
Explanation in simple terms
What:
A court found workers guilty of violence at a car factory.
Who:
The Gurgaon court is the judge, the Maruti Suzuki workers are the convicted people, and a manager is the person killed.
When:
Reported on 10 Mar 2017.
Where:
Gurgaon, Haryana.
Why:
The court convicted the workers for their role in factory violence that caused a death and injuries.
What it means:
The court has reached a decision finding these workers responsible for the violence.
NDTV
News10 Mar 2017
Maruti factory violence verdict: A brief history of the case
The case concerning the July 2012 violence in Maruti's Manesar plant, that left a senior HR executive dead and nearly 100 other officials injured,...
Explanation in simple terms
What:
A violent incident caused the death of an HR manager and hurt many other staff members.
Who:
The State of Haryana is the prosecutor, Maruti Suzuki is the employer, and various workers are the accused.
When:
It happened in July 2012.
Where:
The violence occurred at the Maruti factory in Manesar, Haryana.
Why:
The court reached a verdict after legal proceedings regarding the violence that occurred at the plant.
What it means:
This update summarizes the background of the legal case as it reached a verdict stage.
Hindustan Times

Similar Cases

On trial

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

Actor Darshan and multiple co-accused are charged in connection with the murder of Renukaswamy. Darshan was arrested on June 11, 2024. The Karnataka High Court granted bail to Darshan and co-accused on December 13, 2024, which the State of Karnataka appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reserved judgment on the State's appeal on July 24, 2025.

Karnataka16 sources

yesterday1 Watching

Under investigation

State vs. Unknown Accused — Death of Ramesh in Shahjahanpur

Following the alleged abduction of a minor girl, a violent clash involving stone-pelting and physical assault occurred in the Tahwarganj neighborhood of Shahjahanpur. During the altercation, a 50-year-old man named Ramesh, who was the uncle of the primary accused in the abduction, was beaten to death.

Uttar Pradesh3 sources

3 days ago0 Watching

Closed

State of Haryana vs Suman and others

The accused, a daughter-in-law and her alleged lover, were convicted for the murder of a father-in-law in Faridabad. The prosecution alleged that the accused administered sleeping pills to the victim before shooting him to death.

State of Haryana vs Maruti Suzuki workers — Manesar factory violence case

Case details

Updates

2012 Maruti Factory Violence Case: 31 workers convicted by Gurgaon court

Maruti factory violence verdict: A brief history of the case

Similar Cases

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

State vs. Unknown Accused — Death of Ramesh in Shahjahanpur

State of Haryana vs Suman and others

State vs. Unknown Accused — Hisar railway station murder case

State vs. Soldier — Bahuakbarpur domestic violence and murder case

State vs Aman — Lakshya murder case

Discussion