Qurban Ali vs Union of India — Haridwar Hate Speech Case

Hearing26 Apr 2022

Supreme Court schedules matter for further hearing

The Supreme Court directed that the application be listed for further hearing on May 9, 2022, alongside connected matters.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court decided to review this case later alongside related matters.
Who:: The petitioner is Qurban Ali, the respondent is the Union of India, and the Supreme Court is the judicial body.
When:: Reported on 26 Apr 2022.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court decided to group this case with other connected legal matters.
What it means:: The court will hold another session to discuss the case on May 9, 2022.

Indian Kanoon

Hearing13 Apr 2022

Supreme Court directs Uttarakhand to file status report on investigation

The Supreme Court directed the Uttarakhand government to submit a status report concerning the investigation into the Haridwar hate speech case.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court ordered the state government to provide a report on the current police investigation.
Who:: The Supreme Court is the high-level court overseeing this request, and the Uttarakhand government is the authority responsible for the investigation.
When:: Reported on 13 Apr 2022.
Where:: Haridwar and Uttarakhand.
Why:: The court wants an update on the investigation regarding the alleged hate speech.
What it means:: The state government must now formally update the court on what progress has been made.

Scroll.in

Chargesheet13 Apr 2022

Uttarakhand reports filing of FIRs and chargesheets in hate speech case

The Uttarakhand government informed the Supreme Court that it has registered four FIRs and filed three chargesheets regarding the hate speech incidents in Haridwar.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The police have filed formal reports of incidents involving hate speech.
Who:: The Uttarakhand government reported this to the Supreme Court.
When:: Reported on 13 Apr 2022.
Where:: Haridwar, Uttarakhand.
Why:: Legal documents called chargesheets, which list accusations made by police, were filed regarding hate speech incidents.
What it means:: The government has informed the court that the legal process regarding these complaints is now moving forward.

The Hindu

News14 Jan 2022

Supreme Court Issues Notice in Haridwar Hate Speech Case

The SC on Wednesday issued notice in Qurban Ali v Union of India, a PIL filed against the alleged hate speech in Haridwar and Delhi.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court started a formal legal process by asking for an official response to a petition.
Who:: Qurban Ali is the petitioner, the Union of India is the government respondent, and the Supreme Court is the highest court.
When:: Reported on 14 Jan 2022.
Where:: Haridwar, Delhi, and the Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court acted because of a public interest petition regarding alleged hate speech in Haridwar and Delhi.
What it means:: The court has officially acknowledged the case and the government must now respond to the allegations.

Supreme Court Observer

Hearing12 Jan 2022

CJI-led bench issues notice in Haridwar hate speech case

The Supreme Court bench comprising then-CJI N.V. Ramana and Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli issued notice to the Union of India regarding the plea filed by Qurban Ali.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court started a formal review of a request to investigate hate speech made in Haridwar.
Who:: Then-Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice Surya Kant, and Justice Hima Kohli were the judges; Qurban Ali filed the request.
When:: Reported on 12 Jan 2022.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court issued a notice to the Union of India regarding the request filed by Qurban Ali.
What it means:: The Union of India must now respond to the court about the issues raised in the request.

The Leaflet

Qurban Ali vs Union of India — Haridwar Hate Speech Case

Updates

Similar Cases

Plea against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar

In re: Online Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) regulation

Rahul Gandhi and others vs Union of India — SIR irregularities

Delhi Union of Journalists vs Union of India and Others — Petition regarding police conduct against journalists

Saket Gokhale vs Union of India — PM CARES Fund PIL

In re: Toll collection at Nattika plaza on NH-66

Discussion

Supreme Court schedules matter for further hearing

Supreme Court directs Uttarakhand to file status report on investigation

Uttarakhand reports filing of FIRs and chargesheets in hate speech case

Supreme Court Issues Notice in Haridwar Hate Speech Case

CJI-led bench issues notice in Haridwar hate speech case

Supreme Court issues notice in Haridwar hate speech plea