Quashing Of Predicate Offence On Basis Of Compromise Does Not Extinguish PMLA Proceedings: Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Accused In ₹766 Crore Money Laundering Case
This Court on considering the conspectus of material brought against the applicant, its own conduct of non-disclosure before the Hyderabad Court, as also the cloud regarding its attempt to leave the country, is not satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the applicant is not guilty of the offence of money-laundering and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The requirements of Section 45 of the PMLA for the grant of bail, thus, have not been satisfied. Resultantly, the present application deserves to be rejected”, the Bench said. Cause Title: Rohit Vij v. Directorate Of Enforcement (Neutral Citation: 2026:DHC:6498)
Explanation in simple terms
- What:
- The Delhi High Court denied a request for release from jail for someone facing money laundering charges.
- Who:
- Rohit Vij is the accused, the Directorate of Enforcement is the government agency, and the Delhi High Court is the court.
- When:
- Reported on 11 Aug 2026.
- Where:
- Delhi High Court in Delhi.
- Why:
- The court decided the accused did not meet the strict legal requirements for release and hid information from another court.
- What it means:
- The accused remains in custody while the money laundering case continues despite a compromise in a related matter.
Discussion
No comments yet.
Follow this case to join the discussion.