Pinki Verma vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Timeline

1. 30 Oct 2026News

   Allahabad High Court Cites Manusmriti, Says Husband Has Legal And Pious Duty To Maintain Wife And Children

   The Allahabad High Court has held that a husband is under a legal as well as a pious obligation to maintain his wife, minor children and parents who cannot maintain themselves, citing a verse from the Manusmriti alongside Section 125 CrPC and Supreme Court precedent. ]

   Law Trend

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   A court ruled that husbands must provide financial support to their families.

   Who:

   The Allahabad High Court is the court, while the husband is the person responsible for support.

   When:

   Reported on 30 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Allahabad High Court, Uttar Pradesh.

   Why:

   The court relied on the Manusmriti, legal laws, and past Supreme Court decisions to justify this duty.

   What it means:

   The court confirmed that husbands have a legal and moral duty to pay for their dependents.

2. 29 Oct 2026News

   Allahabad HC cites Manusmriti, stresses husband’s ‘pious obligation’ to maintain his wife, parents

   Prayagraj, Oct 29 (PTI) Citing the Manusmriti, the Allahabad High Court has stressed a husband’s “pious obligation” to maintain his wife, minor children and aged parents. ]

   The Print

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The court stated that a husband has a duty to support his wife, children, and parents.

   Who:

   The Allahabad High Court is the court, while Pinki Verma and the State of Uttar Pradesh are involved.

   When:

   Reported on 29 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Prayagraj, Allahabad High Court, Uttar Pradesh.

   Why:

   The court used the Manusmriti to explain a husband's moral and religious duty to provide financial support.

   What it means:

   This highlights the legal expectations regarding a husband's responsibility to provide for his family's needs.