M/s Aarsuday Projects Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs Jogen Chowdhury

Updates

1. News31 Jan 2026

   PIL Cannot Be Permitted To Become A Vehicle For Selective Challenges: Supreme Court Sets Aside Calcutta

   Court cautions against targeted public interest litigation, holds land character must be proved by unimpeachable material, not assumptions or literary...

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Supreme Court cancelled a public interest lawsuit that targeted specific people or projects.

   Who:

   M/s Aarsuday Projects Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Jogen Chowdhury are the involved parties. The Supreme Court of India issued the ruling.

   When:

   Reported on 31 Jan 2026.

   Where:

   Calcutta and West Bengal.

   Why:

   The court ruled that lawsuits must be based on solid proof rather than mere assumptions or literary ideas.

   What it means:

   Future public interest lawsuits cannot be used to unfairly target specific individuals or projects without concrete evidence.

   verdictum.in
2. Judgment29 Jan 2026

   Supreme Court cautions against PILs for selective challenges in Aarsuday Projects case

   In its judgment regarding the dispute over construction in Shantiniketan, the Supreme Court ruled that demolition or interference with private property must be based on clear statutory grounds. The court highlighted that public interest litigations should not be weaponized for selective challenges against private enterprises.

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Supreme Court decided that private property cannot be demolished without clear legal reasons.

   Who:

   The Supreme Court is the judge, while M/s Aarsuday Projects Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Jogen Chowdhury are the parties involved.

   When:

   Reported on 29 Jan 2026.

   Where:

   Shantiniketan and West Bengal.

   Why:

   The court determined that public interest lawsuits should not be used unfairly to target specific private businesses.

   What it means:

   The court set a rule that interference with private property requires strong legal grounds.

   livelaw.in