Jainendra Baxi vs State of Maharashtra and others

A public interest litigation filed against multiplex operators and the government, challenging the restriction on patrons carrying outside food and beverages into movie theaters. The Bombay High Court observed that multiplexes were compelling families and children to purchase potentially unhealthy food sold within the cinema premises.

Similar Cases

Judgment delivered

In re: National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) payment default investigation

A Mumbai special PMLA court has authorized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to monetize attached assets worth approximately Rs 3,464 crore to facilitate a settlement payout of Rs 1,950 crore to investors affected by the 2013 NSEL payment default case.

Maharashtra7 sources

11 hours ago0 Watching

On trial

CBI & ED vs Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi & Others — PNB Letters of Undertaking (LoU) Bank Fraud Case

Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are accused of orchestrating a massive fraud at Punjab National Bank's Brady House Branch in Mumbai by allegedly obtaining fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) without following due process, causing losses estimated between ₹13,000–14,500 crore to the bank. The CBI registered an FIR and has filed multiple chargesheets before a Special CBI Court in Mumbai — the ED has conducted parallel PMLA proceedings and attached assets worth over ₹18,000 crore. Both primary accused remain at large outside India: Nirav Modi is held in UK custody pending extradition, and Mehul Choksi was arrested in Belgium in 2025 with an Antwerp appellate court having cleared his extradition to India. The domestic trial before the Special CBI Court in Mumbai is ongoing, with supplementary chargesheets continuing to be filed as recently as March 2025.

Maharashtra12 sources

yesterday0 Watching

On trial

Imran Khan vs Union of India — Petition against notice to leave India

Actor Imran Khan has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a notice issued to him that directs him to leave India. The High Court is scheduled to hear the matter.

Maharashtra2 sources

23 hours ago0 Watching

Judgment4 Sep 2018

Bombay High Court judgment on PIL regarding outside food

The Bombay High Court delivered a judgment regarding the restriction on carrying outside food into multiplexes, noting the rights of patrons and the regulatory obligations of the state.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court issued a decision about banning outside food inside cinema halls.
Who:: Jainendra Baxi is the person who filed the case, the State of Maharashtra is a party, and the Bombay High Court is the court that decided the matter.
When:: Reported on 4 Sep 2018.
Where:: Bombay High Court, Maharashtra.
Why:: The court looked at the rights of customers and the responsibilities of the state government to oversee these rules.
What it means:: The judgment provides a legal view on the balance between cinema hall rules and consumer rights.

Indian Kanoon

News9 Aug 2018

PIL over outside food in theatres: Multiplexes compelling families, children to have junk food, says HC

The court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Jainendra Baxi, a film director, through his lawyer Aditya Pratap.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The High Court heard a legal complaint about multiplexes forcing people to buy their food.
Who:: Jainendra Baxi is a film director, Aditya Pratap is his lawyer, and the Bombay High Court is the court.
When:: Reported on 9 Aug 2018.
Where:: The case is at the Bombay High Court in Maharashtra.
Why:: The court noted that cinemas are compelling families and children to eat junk food.
What it means:: The court is now considering this public concern regarding the food policies at movie theatres.

The Indian Express

News14 Jul 2018

Petitioner welcomes Maharashtra government's stand on outside food

The petitioner, represented by advocate Aditya Pratab, welcomed the Maharashtra government's response acknowledging that patrons should be allowed to carry outside food and water into movie multiplexes.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The government agreed that people should be allowed to bring their own food and water into cinemas.
Who:: Jainendra Baxi is the petitioner who started the case, Aditya Pratab is his lawyer, and the Maharashtra government is the state authority.
When:: Reported on 14 Jul 2018.
Where:: The Bombay High Court in Maharashtra.
Why:: The government acknowledged that cinema visitors should be permitted to carry outside food and water.
What it means:: The petitioner has expressed support for this official position taken by the government regarding cinema rules.

Business Standard

Jainendra Baxi vs State of Maharashtra and others

Updates

Similar Cases

In re: National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) payment default investigation

CBI & ED vs Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi & Others — PNB Letters of Undertaking (LoU) Bank Fraud Case

Imran Khan vs Union of India — Petition against notice to leave India

Rohit Joshi vs Thane Municipal Corporation — Thane Integral Ring Metro tree-felling challenge

Axis Trustee Services vs Yes Bank Limited — AT1 Bond Write-off Dispute

In re: Alleged illegal detention of anti-CEC protesters

Discussion

Bombay High Court judgment on PIL regarding outside food

PIL over outside food in theatres: Multiplexes compelling families, children to have junk food, says HC

Petitioner welcomes Maharashtra government's stand on outside food