Jacob Puliyel vs Union of India

10 Mar 2026News

Official PDF documentation of Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India

The Supreme Court provided an official record referencing the Jacob Puliyel case, noting the court's detailed examination of the Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) surveillance system in India.

Supreme Court of India

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court released official documents regarding how India tracks health side effects from vaccinations.
Who:: Jacob Puliyel is the petitioner, the Union of India is the government respondent, and the Supreme Court is the high court examining the evidence.
When:: Reported on 10 Mar 2026.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court conducted a detailed examination of the system used to monitor Adverse Events Following Immunization.
What it means:: These official records provide a formal account of the court's review of vaccine safety surveillance procedures.

2 May 2022Judgment

Full Text Judgment of Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India

The full text of the Supreme Court judgment from May 2, 2022, is documented, confirming the ruling on bodily integrity and the COVID-19 vaccination policy.

Indian Kanoon

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court released a final ruling on policies for COVID-19 vaccinations and personal bodily rights.
Who:: The petitioner is Jacob Puliyel, the respondent is the Union of India, and the court is the Supreme Court of India.
When:: Reported on 2 May 2022.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court reached a decision regarding bodily integrity and government policies for COVID-19 vaccinations.
What it means:: The court has confirmed its formal ruling on the vaccination policy and individual rights.

2 May 2022News

"No One Can Be Forced To Get Vaccinated": Supreme Court's Big Order

Covid-19 Vaccination: Restrictions imposed on individuals through vaccine mandates cannot be called to be proportionate, the court said. Advertisement.

NDTV

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court decided that people cannot be forced to take Covid-19 vaccines.
Who:: Jacob Puliyel is the petitioner, the Union of India is the government respondent, and the Supreme Court of India is the judge.
When:: Reported on 2 May 2022.
Where:: Supreme Court of India.
Why:: The court ruled that restrictions placed on people through vaccine requirements are not proportionate or reasonable.
What it means:: This prevents authorities from enforcing vaccine mandates on individuals.

Jacob Puliyel vs Union of India

Case summary

Latest development

Timeline

Official PDF documentation of Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India

Full Text Judgment of Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India

"No One Can Be Forced To Get Vaccinated": Supreme Court's Big Order

Discussion