In re: Menstrual Hygiene Policy compliance

The Supreme Court has directed the Union Government to collect and compile compliance reports from all States and Union Territories regarding the implementation of menstrual hygiene policies. The Court has expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of response from regional administrations and warned of potential contempt proceedings for continued non-compliance.

Similar Cases

Closed

Plea against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking an investigation into Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The plea alleges that the CEC made unilateral decisions regarding electoral rolls and seeks an SIT probe into his conduct.

Delhi16 sources

4 days ago2 Watching

Judgment delivered

In re: Online Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) regulation

The Supreme Court is hearing a matter concerning the proliferation of online child sexual abuse material and the government's response to curbing such content. The court has expressed concern over the current measures and granted a final opportunity to the Centre to provide detailed information on the steps taken to address the issue.

—7 sources

2 days ago1 Watching

Judgment delivered

In re: Protest outside residence of Union Minister Pralhad Joshi

The Karnataka High Court has issued an interim stay on protests being held by sugarcane growers in front of Union Minister Pralhad Joshi's residence in Hubballi. The court acted on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by local residents citing public inconvenience and directed the district administration to designate an alternative site for the protests.

Karnataka2 sources

2 days ago0 Watching

Hearing19 Oct 2026

Supreme Court grants four weeks for compliance reports on school menstrual hygiene facilities

The Supreme Court has granted a four-week deadline for defaulting states and Union Territories to submit detailed reports on the availability of sanitary pads, toilets, and funding in schools. The court warned that failure to comply could result in the summoning of Chief Secretaries.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court gave states and territories a final deadline to report on school menstrual hygiene facilities.
Who:: The Supreme Court acts as the judge, while states and Union Territories are the parties required to report.
When:: Reported on 19 Oct 2026.
Why:: The court wants to ensure that schools provide sanitary pads, working toilets, and necessary funding.
What it means:: If reports are not submitted, the court may order the top government officials to appear personally.

Free Press Journal

Hearing18 Oct 2026

Supreme Court declares menstrual hygiene a fundamental right

During a hearing on the implementation of menstrual hygiene facilities in schools, the Supreme Court stated that menstrual hygiene constitutes a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court decided that menstrual hygiene is a fundamental right.
Who:: The Supreme Court is the judicial body that made this statement.
When:: Reported on 18 Oct 2026.
Why:: The court reached this conclusion during a hearing about providing hygiene facilities in schools.
What it means:: The court now views access to menstrual hygiene as a protected right under the Constitution.

The New Indian Express

News18 Oct 2026

Menstrual hygiene: Supreme Court expresses displeasure over States, UTs not responding to Centre

The Bench said that on September 1, it had directed the States and UTs to take into consideration the deficiencies highlighted by it and report in that regard by the next date of hearing

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court showed frustration because state governments failed to provide required information to the central government.
Who:: The Supreme Court acts as the judge, while the States and Union Territories act as the respondents.
When:: Reported on 18 Oct 2026.
Why:: The States and Union Territories did not reply to the Centre regarding the menstrual hygiene policy.
What it means:: The court is now putting pressure on these local governments to respond to the central authorities.

The Hindu

News18 Oct 2026

SC warns states, UTs of contempt action over menstrual hygiene judgment

Menstrual hygiene policy: Supreme Court warns states and Union territories of contempt action over non-compliance with its judgment, directing the Centre to gather implementation reports from all regions.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Supreme Court warned state and union territory officials they may face penalties for failing to follow orders.
Who:: The Supreme Court is the judicial body issuing the warning to the governments of states and union territories.
When:: Reported on 18 Oct 2026.
Why:: The court issued the warning because officials failed to comply with a previous judgment regarding menstrual hygiene policies.
What it means:: The court may now take formal legal action against the officials for disobeying its earlier mandatory instructions.

Deccan Herald

In re: Menstrual Hygiene Policy compliance

Updates

Similar Cases

Plea against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar

In re: Online Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) regulation

In re: Protest outside residence of Union Minister Pralhad Joshi

Rahul Gandhi and others vs Union of India — SIR irregularities

In re: Living conditions at P&T Apartment Complex, Mundamveli

K.M. Shajahan vs State of Kerala — Appointment of bodybuilders as Police Inspectors

Discussion

Supreme Court grants four weeks for compliance reports on school menstrual hygiene facilities

Supreme Court declares menstrual hygiene a fundamental right

Menstrual hygiene: Supreme Court expresses displeasure over States, UTs not responding to Centre

SC warns states, UTs of contempt action over menstrual hygiene judgment