In re: Contempt proceedings against Anil Dhameliya, Collector, Vadodara

Timeline

26 Oct 2026News

How dare you? Gujarat High Court raps Vadodara Collector for affidavit making remarks against judge

The Gujarat High Court recently expressed strong displeasure with Vadodara Collector Anil Dhameliya over statements he made about a judicial officer on affidavi

Bar and Bench

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Gujarat High Court scolded the Vadodara Collector for making disrespectful remarks against a judge in an official statement.
Who:: Anil Dhameliya is the Collector of Vadodara, and the Gujarat High Court is the judicial body overseeing the matter.
When:: Reported on 26 Oct 2026.
Where:: The matter is taking place at the Gujarat High Court in Gujarat.
Why:: The court took action because the Collector filed an affidavit, which is a formal written statement made under oath, containing inappropriate comments about a judge.
What it means:: The court has initiated contempt proceedings, which is a formal legal process for addressing behavior that disrespects the court's authority.

24 Oct 2026News

'Keep your bureaucracy in your office’: Gujarat HC rejects Vadodara collector’s apology over remarks against judge

Gujarat High Court rejects Vadodara collector Anil Dhamelia unconditional apology over scandalous remarks against a judge, demanding disciplinary action and warning of departmental inquiry.

Deccan Herald

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Gujarat High Court refused to accept an apology from the Vadodara collector regarding his comments about a judge.
Who:: The Gujarat High Court acts as the judicial authority, and Anil Dhameliya is the Vadodara collector involved in the contempt proceedings.
When:: Reported on 24 Oct 2026.
Where:: Gujarat High Court, Vadodara, Gujarat.
Why:: The court rejected the apology because the official made inappropriate remarks against a judge.
What it means:: The court will continue the contempt proceedings against the collector for his actions.

Similar Cases

Judgment delivered

Sachin Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh

The Allahabad High Court is hearing a contempt matter regarding the failure of police to execute a non-bailable warrant in a kidnapping case. The court, having previously asserted that obstructing lawyers or failing to produce accused persons constitutes contempt, ordered the Senior Superintendent of Police of Meerut to remain in the courtroom on 26 October 2026 due to continued non-compliance. Separately, one accused, Anup Yadav, was arrested on 20 October 2026.

Uttar PradeshCourt matter

On trial

Contempt petition regarding CJP protest movement restrictions

A contempt petition in the Supreme Court alleges that authorities violated judicial orders regarding metro and rail service restrictions during the 10 October 2026 CJP protest. While the court has issued directions on protest management and mandated the preservation of video evidence, the Union Home Secretary and Delhi Police have submitted affidavits defending their actions and tendering apologies. CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka were released from judicial custody and appeared before a Special Executive Magistrate on 23 October 2026.

DelhiCourt matter

On trial

Contempt petition regarding detention of protesters and journalists during protest against CEC

The Supreme Court is hearing 46 petitions, including contempt pleas and Habeas Corpus filings, regarding alleged police brutality, illegal detentions, and the suppression of protests against the Election Commission of India in October 2026. The Court has directed the Delhi Police to preserve CCTV footage and submit prohibitory orders under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, while also considering an investigation into the mistreatment of journalists and protesters. Lawyers representing detainees recently filed a complaint on 20 October 2026 regarding the disappearance of mobile phones allegedly confiscated by police.