In re: Compensation under UP Mahila Samman Kosh for POCSO survivors

The Allahabad High Court ruled that victims of sexual assault under the POCSO Act cannot be denied compensation from the Uttar Pradesh Rani Laxmibai Mahila Samman Kosh solely on the ground that the medical examination report does not show external injury marks. The Court held that the absence of injuries does not negate the occurrence of sexual assault.

Similar Cases

On trial

State vs. UP Police Constable — Gorakhpur minor kidnapping, rape and murder case

A Uttar Pradesh police constable assigned to the Dial 112 emergency response system was arrested for the alleged abduction, rape, and murder of a 10-year-old girl in Gorakhpur. The girl was reported missing after being taken from near the district hospital, leading to the discovery of her body and the subsequent arrest of the accused. The case is currently under trial before the POCSO court.

Uttar Pradesh6 sources

5 hours ago0 Watching

Judgment delivered

Umesh Chand vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

The Supreme Court set aside an order from the Allahabad High Court that had granted the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act to individuals convicted in a case involving an attack under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court ruled that the nature of the offense and the severity of injuries caused must be considered, and that probation cannot be granted casually in cases involving grievous injuries.

Uttar Pradesh4 sources

18 hours ago0 Watching

Closed

State vs Rakesh Gangwar

The POCSO Court in Farrukhabad has sentenced Rakesh Gangwar to life imprisonment following his conviction for the sexual assault of an eight-year-old girl. The court also imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh on the accused.

Uttar Pradesh2 sources

3 hours ago0 Watching

News23 Oct 2026

Details of FIR and chargesheet in POCSO compensation case disclosed

The Allahabad High Court matter concerning the UP Mahila Samman Kosh compensation arises from an FIR registered at the Sarojini Nagar police station in Lucknow on December 7, 2022. A chargesheet in this specific case was subsequently filed by the investigating agency on January 13, 2023.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: Details regarding a formal police complaint and a document outlining specific charges were revealed.
Who:: The Allahabad High Court is overseeing the matter, and the investigating agency filed the chargesheet.
When:: The police complaint was filed on December 7, 2022, and the chargesheet was filed on January 13, 2023.
Where:: This took place at the Sarojini Nagar police station in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, and the Allahabad High Court.
Why:: The information was disclosed as part of a court matter concerning compensation for survivors under the UP Mahila Samman Kosh.
What it means:: The official record of accusations, known as a chargesheet, has now been shared within the court proceedings.

The Hindu

Judgment23 Oct 2026

Allahabad High Court orders Rs 3 lakh compensation for POCSO survivor

The Allahabad High Court directed the payment of Rs 3 lakh in compensation to a minor POCSO survivor, emphasizing that the absence of physical injury marks in a medical report cannot be the sole basis for denying welfare relief under the UP Rani Laxmibai Mahila Samman Kosh.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Allahabad High Court ordered a payment of 3 lakh rupees as financial relief to a young survivor.
Who:: The Allahabad High Court is the judicial body, and the minor is a survivor under the POCSO law.
When:: Reported on 23 Oct 2026.
Where:: The Allahabad High Court in Uttar Pradesh.
Why:: The court decided that missing physical injury marks in medical records do not justify denying welfare money.
What it means:: The survivor will receive the 3 lakh rupees in compensation for their support and recovery.

India Today

News23 Oct 2026

POCSO survivor cannot be denied compensation solely due to absence of injury marks: Allahabad HC

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court ruled that victims cannot be denied financial support just because they lack visible injury marks.
Who:: The Allahabad High Court is the court and the survivors are the people seeking support.
When:: Reported on 23 Oct 2026.
Where:: Allahabad High Court, Uttar Pradesh.
Why:: The court decided that a lack of physical injury does not disprove that a sexual offense occurred.
What it means:: Financial aid offices must now process compensation requests even if medical records show no physical trauma.

Hindustan Times

News20 Oct 2026

UP Mahila Samman Kosh | Can't Deny Compensation To POCSO Survivor Citing Absence Of Injury In Medical Report: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has observed that the absence of injuries in a medical report cannot be a ground to deny compensation to a victim of penetrative sexual assault under the Uttar Pradesh Rani...

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court ruled that victims cannot be denied financial help just because a medical report shows no injury.
Who:: The Allahabad High Court made this decision regarding survivors of crimes covered under the POCSO law.
When:: Reported on 20 Oct 2026.
Where:: Allahabad High Court, Uttar Pradesh.
Why:: The court decided that a lack of physical injury in a medical report is not a valid reason.
What it means:: Authorities must now provide financial support from the state fund even if medical records show no injury.

LiveLaw

In re: Compensation under UP Mahila Samman Kosh for POCSO survivors

Case details

Updates

Similar Cases

State vs. UP Police Constable — Gorakhpur minor kidnapping, rape and murder case

Umesh Chand vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

State vs Rakesh Gangwar

State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Accused in Mainpuri minor rape case

State vs Three Accused — 1983 Fatehpur Gangrape case

State vs Pappu — Muzaffarnagar POCSO case

Discussion

Details of FIR and chargesheet in POCSO compensation case disclosed

Allahabad High Court orders Rs 3 lakh compensation for POCSO survivor

POCSO survivor cannot be denied compensation solely due to absence of injury marks: Allahabad HC

UP Mahila Samman Kosh | Can't Deny Compensation To POCSO Survivor Citing Absence Of Injury In Medical Report: Allahabad High Court