In re: Allegations of misuse of Form 7 during Uttar Pradesh Special Integrated Revision

Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case — Citizenship and voter status

Opposition leaders have challenged the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision process, alleging illegal voter deletions and irregularities across multiple states. On 28 October 2026, the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to facilitate the restoration of deleted voters in Delhi and mandated the investigation of bulk Form 7 submissions in Uttar Pradesh. The Court continues to oversee these matters, having requested explanations for millions of deletions while clarifying that no final ruling has been made regarding the use of logical discrepancies in electoral roll revisions.

Rahul Gandhi vs Election Commission of India — Special Intensive Revision of Voter List

Rahul Gandhi and INDIA bloc leaders have challenged the nationwide Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in the Supreme Court, alleging widespread procedural irregularities and mass voter deletions. The Court has directed the Election Commission of India to investigate these deletions in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi, while clarifying on 31 October 2026 that the completion of the revision process does not freeze electoral rolls. The Court has also requested individual affidavits from the Chief Election Commissioner and other commissioners regarding these allegations.

In re: Andhra Pradesh civic poll nomination process

The Supreme Court is addressing allegations of candidate obstruction during the Andhra Pradesh local body election nomination process and intends to frame formal electoral security guidelines. While the Court disposed of a YSRCP petition on 27 October 2026, the Andhra Pradesh High Court subsequently disposed of a separate public interest litigation on 30 October 2026 after the State Election Commission confirmed it mandated online publication of candidate nomination papers and affidavits.