Election Commission of India vs. Madras High Court

Updates

1. News8 May 2021

   Why Media Cant Be Blamed for Reporting on Judicial Proceedings

   In the recent case the Election Commission brought against the Madras high court, the Supreme Court has once again upheld that media is well within its...

   Explanation in simple terms

   The Supreme Court has ruled that the media cannot be held responsible for reporting on oral observations made by judges during open court hearings. The court emphasized that proceedings in a courtroom are public and journalists have a right to report what happens there. This decision protects the freedom of the press to cover judicial debates accurately. It confirms that reporting on public court discussions is a vital part of maintaining transparency in the justice system.

   m.thewire.in
2. News7 May 2021

   Media has right to report exchanges during hearings: SC

   India News: Supreme Court on Thursday said the media had an unfettered right to report exchanges during hearings as it rejected the Election Commission's...

   Explanation in simple terms

   The Supreme Court ruled that the media has a fundamental right to report on oral remarks made by judges during court hearings. This means that journalists can freely share what is said in court, even if those comments are not part of a final written order. The court emphasized that open reporting is essential for public transparency and helps citizens understand how judicial proceedings unfold in real time.

   timesofindia.indiatimes.com