Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption vs Tamil Nadu State Information Commission

Updates

1. News14 Oct 2026

   Madras HC upholds RTI panel’s order on graft report

   CHENNAI: The Madras HC has dismissed an appeal filed by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) against the TN State Information Commission’s or

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The Madras High Court confirmed a decision requiring the release of an investigation report regarding corruption.

   Who:

   The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption is the agency that investigates corruption. The Tamil Nadu State Information Commission is the panel that decides on public access to records. The Madras High Court is the court that reviewed the matter.

   When:

   Reported on 14 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Madras High Court, Tamil Nadu.

   Why:

   The court upheld the order because it supports the public right to access information about graft investigations.

   What it means:

   The agency must now comply with the information panel's previous order to share the report.

   The New Indian Express
2. News13 Oct 2026

   DVAC Not Exempt From Sharing Information Relating To Corruption And Human Rights Violations Under RTI Act: Madras High Court

   The Madras High Court recently held that the Directorate ofVigilance and Anti-Corruption is not

   Explanation in simple terms

   What:

   The court ruled that an anti-corruption agency cannot withhold information about corruption or human rights violations.

   Who:

   The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption is the agency, and the Tamil Nadu State Information Commission is the public information body. The Madras High Court is the court making the decision.

   When:

   Reported on 13 Oct 2026.

   Where:

   Madras High Court, Tamil Nadu.

   Why:

   The court decided that the Right to Information Act prevents the agency from keeping such records secret.

   What it means:

   The agency must now provide information regarding corruption and human rights abuses when requested.

   LiveLaw