Appeal Against Penal Sanction Rooted In FERA Contravention Maintainable On Criminal Side Under FEMA: Calcutta High Court
The Court held that using Section 35 of FEMA as the appellate route does not alter the criminal character of a penal liability preserved from the repealed FERA regime.
Explanation in simple terms
- What:
- A court ruled that an appeal against a penalty remains a criminal matter even under new laws.
- Who:
- Barun Kumar Chattopadhyay is the appellant, the Special Director is the enforcement agency, and the Calcutta High Court is the court.
- When:
- Reported on 28 Oct 2026.
- Where:
- Calcutta High Court, West Bengal.
- Why:
- The court decided that changing the legal process for appeals does not remove the criminal nature of the original penalty.
- What it means:
- This confirms that the case will be handled under criminal law procedures despite changes in the governing rules.




Discussion
No comments yet.
Follow this case to join the discussion.