Hearing
Counsel argues for deity in defamation suit against Dhruv Rathee
During proceedings at the Saket Court, counsel for plaintiff Amita Sachdeva submitted that since deities cannot approach the court themselves, it is necessary for others to initiate legal action when religious sentiments are defamed.
Explanation in simple terms
- What:
- A lawyer argued that people must act on behalf of gods in court for defamation claims.
- Who:
- Amita Sachdeva is the plaintiff who filed the suit and Dhruv Rathee is the defendant.
- When:
- Reported on 15 Oct 2026.
- Where:
- Saket Court, Delhi.
- Why:
- The lawyer stated that deities cannot go to court themselves when their religious feelings are hurt.
- What it means:
- The court is considering whether others have the legal standing to represent religious figures in this case.
Discussion
No comments yet.
Follow this case to join the discussion.