A. Sathyanarayana Swamy vs The High Court of Karnataka

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the registry's refusal to provide a litigant with audio-visual recordings of court proceedings. The court held that under the Karnataka Rules on Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings, 2021, litigants do not have an inherent right to obtain such recordings without a specific court order.

Similar Cases

Judgment delivered

In re: Criminal liability of advocates practising without qualifying AIBE

The Karnataka High Court held that advocates practising law without clearing the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) may face criminal prosecution. The Court clarified that disciplinary proceedings by the Bar Council do not preclude private individuals from initiating criminal action against such practitioners.

Karnataka4 sources

3 hours ago0 Watching

On trial

State of Karnataka vs. Unnamed Accused (Father of minor driver)

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal trial to proceed against a 51-year-old father from Mysuru who allegedly allowed his minor child to drive a vehicle, leading to an incident that resulted in culpable homicide. The court emphasized the responsibility of parents in preventing minors from operating vehicles.

Karnataka4 sources

11 hours ago0 Watching

On trial

State vs. Driver — Attempt to murder of traffic policeman in Bengaluru

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash a criminal case against a driver accused of running over a traffic policeman who attempted to stop the vehicle for a drunk driving check. The court observed that a car cannot be used as a weapon to intimidate public servants discharging their duties.

Karnataka2 sources

14 hours ago0 Watching

News22 Oct 2026

Litigant Has No Right To Seek Copies Of Recordings Of Court Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court was considering a petition challenging the dismissal of an application seeking copies of the audio-visual recordings of the Court proceedings.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court decided that a person involved in a lawsuit cannot demand copies of audio or video recordings.
Who:: A. Sathyanarayana Swamy is the litigant, and the High Court of Karnataka is the legal body that issued the ruling.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Karnataka High Court, Karnataka.
Why:: The court ruled that litigants do not have a legal right to access these specific session records.
What it means:: The court denied the request, meaning the litigant will not receive copies of the recorded court proceedings.

Verdictum

News22 Oct 2026

Parties cannot demand a copy of the audio-video recording of the hearing without the court's permission: Karnataka High Court

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court ruled that people involved in a case cannot get audio-video recordings of hearings without permission.
Who:: A. Sathyanarayana Swamy is the petitioner and the High Court of Karnataka is the judicial body.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Karnataka High Court, Karnataka.
Why:: The court decided this to control access to official recordings of court proceedings.
What it means:: Parties must now seek formal approval from the court if they want copies of video or audio records.

Law Trend

News22 Oct 2026

No Right To Seek Copies Of Court Proceeding Recordings Unless Specifically Ordered By Court: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that the Karnataka Rules on Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings, 2021 do not give a litigant any right to obtain copies of recordings of court proceedings unless the Court specifically orders it. Justice C.M. ]

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court ruled that people cannot get copies of court recordings without a specific judge's order.
Who:: A. Sathyanarayana Swamy is the petitioner and the High Court of Karnataka is the legal authority.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Karnataka High Court, Karnataka.
Why:: The court decided that there is no automatic right for citizens to access these private records.
What it means:: People must now ask a judge for permission before they can obtain copies of court proceedings.

Law Trend

A. Sathyanarayana Swamy vs The High Court of Karnataka

Case details

Updates

Similar Cases

In re: Criminal liability of advocates practising without qualifying AIBE

State of Karnataka vs. Unnamed Accused (Father of minor driver)

State vs. Driver — Attempt to murder of traffic policeman in Bengaluru

In re: Jurisdiction for complaints regarding false election affidavits

Mahammed Hanif and others vs State of Karnataka and another

Husband vs Wife — Permanent alimony reduction case

Discussion

Litigant Has No Right To Seek Copies Of Recordings Of Court Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

Parties cannot demand a copy of the audio-video recording of the hearing without the court's permission: Karnataka High Court

No Right To Seek Copies Of Court Proceeding Recordings Unless Specifically Ordered By Court: Karnataka High Court