A. Inamdar and others vs State of Maharashtra

The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR against the trustees, principal, and staff of a Pune college concerning the drowning death of 14 students at Murud beach in February 2016. The Court determined that responsibility for safety at public beaches rests with the state government, not the college authorities, particularly when the students involved are adults.

Similar Cases

On trial

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

Actor Darshan and multiple co-accused are charged in connection with the murder of Renukaswamy. Darshan was arrested on June 11, 2024. The Karnataka High Court granted bail to Darshan and co-accused on December 13, 2024, which the State of Karnataka appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reserved judgment on the State's appeal on July 24, 2025.

Karnataka16 sources

last week1 Watching

Under investigation

State of Maharashtra vs Harsha Gopal Kadam — Schaeffler India factory accident case

Harsha Gopal Kadam, the CEO and Managing Director of Schaeffler India, was taken into custody by Pune police in connection with a factory accident that occurred on June 9, 2026. The incident, which took place at a facility in Talegaon MIDC, involved a sudden discharge of carbon dioxide during a cylinder replacement operation and resulted in the deaths of two workers. Police have named Kadam in the investigation as the occupier of the premises.

Maharashtra3 sources

21 hours ago0 Watching

On trial

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ashish Mishra — Lakhimpur Kheri violence case

Ashish Mishra is facing a criminal trial regarding the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence incident. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a plea related to the case on October 26, 2026, as the trial approaches its conclusion.

Uttar Pradesh2 sources

2 hours ago0 Watching

News22 Oct 2026

Bombay High Court Calls For Uniform Warning Policy At Public Beaches, Directs State To Fund Rescue Measures

The Court asked the Chief Secretary to consider strengthening beach-safety measures while quashing the negligence FIR against college authorities and staff over the drowning of 14 adult students at Murud beach.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The Bombay High Court ordered the government to create consistent safety warnings and pay for lifeguard services.
Who:: A. Inamdar and others are the petitioners, the State of Maharashtra is the government body, and the Bombay High Court is the court.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Bombay High Court, Maharashtra.
Why:: The court wants to improve safety and prevent accidents at public beaches.
What it means:: The state must now establish a standard warning system and provide funding for rescue measures at these locations.

Verdictum

Judgment22 Oct 2026

Responsibility for safety on public beaches lies with the state government, not college staff: Bombay High Court quashes FIR in the case of 14 students' deaths.

The Bombay High Court has quashed the FIR registered against the trustees, in-charge principal, teachers, and other staff of a Pune college in the case of the drowning death of 14 students at Murud beach in Raigad, Maharashtra, in February 2016.

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The court cancelled a criminal case against college staff members regarding the deaths of students.
Who:: A. Inamdar and others are the accused college staff, the State of Maharashtra represents the government, and the Bombay High Court is the judge.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Maharashtra and the Bombay High Court.
Why:: The court ruled that the state government is responsible for ensuring safety on public beaches, not the college employees.
What it means:: The criminal case against the college staff is closed and the legal proceedings against them end.

Law Trend

Judgment22 Oct 2026

State Responsible for Safety at Public Beaches, Not College Staff: Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Murud Drowning Case

The Bombay High Court has quashed the FIR registered under Section 304A read with Section 34 of the IPC against the trustees, in-charge principal, teachers and staff of a Pune college over the drowning of 14 students at Murud beach, Raigad, in February 2016. ]

Explanation in simple terms

What:: The High Court ended criminal proceedings against college staff following a drowning incident at a beach.
Who:: The accused are A. Inamdar and others who are college staff. The State of Maharashtra is the government body involved. The Bombay High Court is the court that made the decision.
When:: Reported on 22 Oct 2026.
Where:: Murud, Maharashtra, and the Bombay High Court.
Why:: The court decided that maintaining safety at public beaches is the duty of the state government, not the teachers.
What it means:: The legal case against the college staff is now closed as the court canceled the criminal complaint.

Law Trend

A. Inamdar and others vs State of Maharashtra

Case details

Updates

Similar Cases

State of Karnataka vs Actor Darshan and others — Renukaswamy Murder Case

State of Maharashtra vs Harsha Gopal Kadam — Schaeffler India factory accident case

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ashish Mishra — Lakhimpur Kheri violence case

In re: Stampede at Chorebagan Sarbojanin Durga Puja pandal

In re: Death of student in arch collapse at engineering college event in Hyderabad

State vs Varun Kumar and Akhilesh Verma — Murder of Rakesh Agrawal

Discussion

Bombay High Court Calls For Uniform Warning Policy At Public Beaches, Directs State To Fund Rescue Measures

Responsibility for safety on public beaches lies with the state government, not college staff: Bombay High Court quashes FIR in the case of 14 students' deaths.

State Responsible for Safety at Public Beaches, Not College Staff: Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Murud Drowning Case